Alana Subasic vs Polina Skopintseva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• What is the recent second serve performance? Subasic has won 34.37% of second serve points, while Skopintseva has secured 41.28%, suggesting a slight edge for Skopintseva.
• How effective are they in return games? Subasic has claimed 53.18% of points on opponents' second serves and 35.37% on first serves. Skopintseva trails slightly with 48.99% and 37.8% respectively.
• Who performs better under pressure? Subasic has saved 44.16% of breakpoints compared to Skopintseva's 42.86%, giving Subasic a minor advantage in crucial moments.
• How do their overall performances compare? Subasic has won 62.96% of matches over the past year, while Skopintseva has achieved a 60% win rate, showing a slight overall superiority for Subasic.
• On which surface do they excel? Subasic has a 63% win rate on Hard courts, whereas Skopintseva boasts a 71% win rate on the same surface, suggesting Skopintseva is slightly more adept.
• What level of competitions do they mostly play in? Subasic has been successful in 76.19% of matches in lower-tier tournaments, while Skopintseva has achieved a 60% win rate in similar events.
• Who has faced tougher opponents? Subasic has competed against players with an average rank of 330.94, whereas Skopintseva has faced opponents averaging a rank of 186.87, indicating Skopintseva's exposure to stronger competition.
• How do they fare in deciding sets? Subasic has won 33% of deciding sets, whereas Skopintseva has excelled with an 80% success rate, showing a clear advantage for Skopintseva in tight matches.
• What about their breakpoint conversion? Recent stats show Subasic has converted 37.94% of breakpoints, while Skopintseva has converted 47.27%, which might be a significant factor during the match.

Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):

As the players head into this matchup, several critical factors will likely influence the outcome. Skopintseva's superior second serve statistics and her ability to convert breakpoints more effectively provide a clear edge in serve-related metrics.

Moreover, Skopintseva's impressive record in deciding sets suggests she can maintain composure in high-pressure scenarios, which could be crucial should the match go the distance. Her higher success rate on Hard courts further tilts the balance in her favor.

Though Subasic demonstrates solid return games and breakpoint saving capacity, the varied competition levels faced imply Skopintseva has more experience against tougher opponents. Overall, these factors combine to make Skopintseva the likely victor in this upcoming encounter based on current form and recent trends.